|
Foreclosures up 12% in tri-county area
|
By Michael Braga, Herald Tribune
Originally Published June, 14 2008 at 12:09 AM Updated June, 14 2008 at 12:09 AM
|
Foreclosure filings spiked 12 percent in Manatee, Sarasota and
Charlotte counties during May as neighboring Fort Myers-Cape Coral
posted the second highest per-capita rate in the nation.
One out of every 79 homes in Fort Myers-Cape Coral was in foreclosure last month. By
comparison, one in every 179 Charlotte households, one in every 206
Sarasota households and one in every 292 Manatee households were in
foreclosure. The national average was one in every 483, data released
Thursday by Irvine, Calif.-based RealtyTrac showed. Though better
off than its southern neighbor, the relentless rise in foreclosures in
Manatee, Sarasota and Charlotte is still causing problems for borrowers
and bankers alike. A total of 2,161 filings -- default notices,
auction sale notices and bank repossessions -- entered the court
systems last month. That compared with 1,934 in April and 1,432
foreclosures a year ago. Foreclosure filings in Sarasota County
were up 19 percent to 1,054 from April, while rising 7 percent to 538
in Charlotte and 4 percent to 569 in Manatee. "May was the third
straight month where we've seen a month-to-month increase in
foreclosure activity and the 29th straight month we've seen a
year-over-year increase," said James Saccacio, RealtyTrac's
chief executive. Default notices rose 1 percent, while auctions
dropped 3 percent, but bank repossessions rose by double-digits from
the previous month and doubled from a year ago. There are 700,000
bank-owned homes in RealtyTrac's database now, he said. Some encouragement It
was encouraging that there were fewer foreclosures at the start of the
process and more at the end, said Tramm Hudson, a longtime Southwest
Florida banker who recently started a consulting firm. But it also meant that banks are taking on an increasing share of the burden. Hudson
estimated that it takes six months and costs a bank about $3,000 in
legal fees for an uncontested foreclosure and up to 10 months and
$10,000 when a homeowner puts up a fight. "The reason a bank
should only lend 80 percent of the value of a house is that if the bank
has to take the house back, it will cost it about 10 percent to market
and maintain it," Hudson said. "The bank needs the other 10 percent
cushion to offset lowball offers from buyers of foreclosed properties,
or to pay for deferred maintenance caused by former owners who either
failed to keep the place up or trashed it on the way out." Those
carrying costs make bankers want to get rid of foreclosed properties as
quickly as possible. That in turn is creating opportunities for
enterprising real estate agents. "We just started in March," said
Joan Erni, who was recruited to head up a bank-owned real estate, or
REO, program for Michael Saunders & Co. "We have already signed up
eight local community banks and have put a process in place to help
them value properties and get them into marketing condition." Her
firm has sold one bank-owned property on Siesta Key so far and has
contracts pending on two of eight REOs on the company's Web site. "The properties are selling quickly," Erni said. "The one we sold, sold in two days." Plenty
of investors are watching properties go through the foreclosure process
and swooping down as soon as banks take possession, said Peter
Zalewski, a Bal Harbour consultant who runs CondoVultures.com. "Banks
are very often looking to dump properties within 90 days," he said.
"They usually start with one price and move down every month. By the
last month, they are looking to take anything they can get." Any end in sight? "I
don't think we've seen the bottom yet," said Nancy Detert, a former
mortgage broker running for state Senate who is pitching a "community
downpayment assistance plan." It would allow home buyers with good
credit to receive local and state government assistance to buy houses
in some stage of foreclosure. "We have so much empty supply,"
Detert said. "It is devaluing the houses owned by the rest of us and
devaluing whole neighborhoods." The answer is to let members of
the work force occupy the houses and pay whatever they can on a first
mortgage, she said. The community can then provide a
non-interest-bearing second mortgage which can be repaid when the house
is ultimately sold. "If we took a sponge and sponged up some of the supply, we'd have more demand," Detert said.
|